The New Rules (Chapter 54 - March 3rd, 2025)

[LittleFrieda]

Plagiarism is a tort good for civil action like demanding money damages. It is not a crime.

Er, sorry, tort? I'm not familiar with this word and I'm having trouble discerning what you mean.

The victim finds a lawyer and sues the perp in civil court. Possibly winning a monetary award. The other type of court is Criminal Court and can include jail time.

[Somebody]

Fantastic chapter. Nice to see Abby's mom getting her comeuppance.
As for all this stuff bout accusations, the difference is whether you actually catch them in the act as you accuse them. If you didn't see a crime going on, even a heinous one, you can't be sure enough to throw accusation around. That's a huge problem in society today., but if you literally have the text in front of you, identical, then start accusing plagiarism.

[F-250]

HI
I have a question, do you how many chapters there are left?

[underdog_13]

HI
I have a question, do you how many chapters there are left?

My hope? As many as possible

[SixPathsKeyblader]

Nice chapter! For now, Abbie is no longer permanuded, except for at school where naked is now her uniform. At least she can go out with clothes on though (ie. no more naked jaunts through the mall). This is all just theoretical though. Knowing this type of story, and this particular author, Abbie's freedom from nudity won't last long.

[computerphoto]

Nice chapter! For now, Abbie is no longer permanuded, except for at school where naked is now her uniform. At least she can go out with clothes on though (ie. no more naked jaunts through the mall). This is all just theoretical though. Knowing this type of story, and this particular author, Abbie's freedom from nudity won't last long.

that only if she has any clothes left, we have no idea if she still has any clothes left or not.

[darklord66]

I don't think it going to be that easy for Abbie to have clothes back, first she can't wear them to school, and 2nd like another comment said we have no idea if Abbie has any clothes left at all, I think there going to be a major twist coming in the story still.

[Cyberweasel89]

Plagiarism is a tort good for civil action like demanding money damages. It is not a crime.

Er, sorry, tort? I'm not familiar with this word and I'm having trouble discerning what you mean.

Amazon should be notified about a 'Possible Copyright Infringement' since they might be party to lawsuits.

The 'Possible' is like saying 'alleged rapist'.

"Possible plagiarist" might be a good workaround. After all, I can't think of any other term than "plagiarist" to refer to Melissa Trump, but I still want to respect Superevil7's wishes of restriction of speech regarding criminal terms. It feels very semantic, but I have no reason to not respect Superevil7's wishes here.

I also can't help but note the irony that Superevil7's possible plagiarist is going by the pen name "Melissa Trump." Superevil7 is a big Donald Trump fan. Though I think it's just a coincidence. "Melissa Trump" isn't a unique name, as a Google search reveals several women by that name who aren't related to Donald Trump at all. Still, the coincidence is funny in a way. It's ironic as it is sad that Superevil became victim to someone with a surname he's a fan of.

Just because someone has the last name Clinton, Carter, Lincoln, Trump, kennedy, Bush, Nixon, and so on does not mean they are related to the president at all, I known 2 people personally which the last name Nixon it just the last name and is all.

There is almost 5K people in the US with the last name Trump, here an article about it. https://www.vox.com/2016/8/9/12411282/t ... -last-name

Well, yeah, of course. That's why I pointed out it was a funny, if sad, coincidence.

Though, fun fact! Donald Trump's surname wasn't originally Trump. It was Drumpf, but his father legally changed their surname because he wanted a name more marketable for branding on products. I'm something of a history buff, so random trivia like that tends to fill my mind palace.

Plagiarism is a tort good for civil action like demanding money damages. It is not a crime.

Er, sorry, tort? I'm not familiar with this word and I'm having trouble discerning what you mean.

The victim finds a lawyer and sues the perp in civil court. Possibly winning a monetary award. The other type of court is Criminal Court and can include jail time.

Oh, that's what you mean. Thanks!

Though even if that happened, I'm not sure if Superevil7 would be okay with us dropping "possible" from "plagiarist."

Even after Donald Trump was convicted of fraud and sexual assault, Superevil7 still insisted that no one was allowed to call him a fraudster or rapist. I'm not sure why an official conviction doesn't count in his case, when he said that an official conviction was necessary to use those crime-related terms. Though I suppose a more appropriate question is why he wants to enforce semantics into casual conversation in the first place, especially when that seems counter-intuitive to Libertarianism to me.

Like, my father is a sexual predator towards children, yet Superevil7 says even I as one of his victims am not allowed to call my father a rapist because he was never convicted of a crime related to his actions. And I don't know who thinks that saying that to a rape victim is normal, but... well, writers tend to be eccentric, I guess.

Though I do wonder if there's a connection between this restriction of the term "rapist" and Superevil's belief that if a man has power, wealth, or influence, he automatically has consent to grope women and any woman is obligated to let him do it. Which is a social standard I've never seen anyone but Superevil assert, but... hey, it is what it is.

It's also interesting to me that Superevil has no issue with the term "pedophile" being used against lolicons, despite him being friends with two self-identifying lolicons. I mean, agree or disagree with those two words needing to be synonymous or not, but it's still an odd gap in his semantic beliefs he tries to use to force restrictions of language on others. Fraudster, rapist, and plagiarist bad outside of formal legal contexts, but lolicon = pedophile is fine despite two of his friends being lolicons? I don't get the inconsistency, but maybe it's because I'm not a Libertarian. :/

Fantastic chapter. Nice to see Abby's mom getting her comeuppance.
As for all this stuff bout accusations, the difference is whether you actually catch them in the act as you accuse them. If you didn't see a crime going on, even a heinous one, you can't be sure enough to throw accusation around. That's a huge problem in society today., but if you literally have the text in front of you, identical, then start accusing plagiarism.

Yeah, but... that's not what Superevil7 told me. He said it wasn't witnesses or evidence that matters. It has to be an actual criminal conviction via police charges or a court of law, and only then will he allow unrestricted speech of others to use terms like "fraudster" or "rapist." But as mentioned above, despite Donald Trump having those convictions, he still forbids calling him those things, and won't say why they don't meet his personal qualifications for unrestricted freedom of speech in casual conversation. I tried asking him once back when I was friends with him in a Discord server, but he changed the subject. It honestly makes casual chat around him difficult, because you never know when he'll butt in to demand we're not allowed to use certain words no matter how hyperbolic or casual the chit-chat is.

It kinda gives me SJW or Tumblrina vibes, TBH, but I try to accommodate Superevil7's hang-ups about semantic language use since he doesn't seem to be restricting others' speech with any malice, and I have literally no reason to deliberately antagonize him by doing the opposite. No reason to be a dick just because a guy has some hang-ups on word usage, ya know?

[superevil7]

It kinda gives me SJW or Tumblrina vibes, TBH, but I try to accommodate Superevil7's hang-ups about semantic language use since he doesn't seem to be restricting others' speech with any malice, and I have literally no reason to deliberately antagonize him by doing the opposite. No reason to be a dick just because a guy has some hang-ups on word usage, ya know?

Thank you! I appreciate it!

[superevil7]

HI
I have a question, do you how many chapters there are left?

As I've said before, I've written up to chapter 59 already, and there's still more to go. So, I guess we'll all just have to wait and see.